Parents Can Be The Death Knell of Inclusion
Who really decides who our kids spend time with?
Believe it or not, it’s not always the kids.
Sometimes parents become gatekeepers and I’m noticing it now that I’ve been a parent for eight years. How about you—have you noticed it too?
Ever managing, arranging, and controlling the social lives of their children, these parents curate, filter, and often unintentionally manipulate the playdates, birthday party guest lists, after-school hangouts, sleepovers of their child(ren).
I don’t remember it really growing up in the 1990s. Or maybe my parents shielded me from noticing. When I step back, I see the bigger problem…it hasn’t gotten worse since I was a kid, it’s just more noticeable and accessible because of technology.
Of course, parenting has always involved some degree of social coordination. Children need rides, supervision, and permission to spend time together. But somewhere between facilitating friendships and managing them, can come collateral damage.
A mom warned parents about the ‘playdate pipeline’ and launched a fascinating debate in an Upworthy article, earlier this month. It brought this phenomenon about how parents influence their children’s social circles into focus for me. And when I step back, I see a bigger problem: we as parents may be shaping childhood social dynamics in ways that hurt more than they help.
When Inclusion Becomes a Game of Chess
There’s something unsettling about how some parents treat kids’ friendships as game pieces in a social chess match.
It can feel careless, even cruel.
Whether consciously or not, some prioritize convenience, familiarity, or social standing over openness, leaving certain children on the fringes. Not necessarily because of who those children are, but because of who their parents are—or aren’t.
And it can sting.
It stings when your child comes home, confused or hurt, realizing they’re not part of the “core group.” It stings when you recognize that all the kindness, all the effort, all the little gestures don’t “count” against the invisible tally some parents are keeping.
Shame on us, truly, if we allow our own insecurities, preferences, or social ambitions to dictate our children’s relationships.
I liken it to a concept from one of my favorite novels, The Great Gatsby: “bad drivers.” Bad drivers in the context of the novel are people who are reckless and barely notice when they’ve left others behind or hurt in their quest for whatever it is they want.
When Parents’ Friendships Determine Their Children’s
Here’s what troubles me most: sometimes a child’s opportunity for friendship depends less on whether two children like each other and more on whether their parents do.
Children who laugh together at recess, sit together at lunch, or genuinely enjoy each other’s company may never see those friendships extend beyond the school day. Not because either child lacks interest, but because one or both adults have already established their preferred circles.
If the parents are friends, the children often become friends, too. The parents socialize, so the children are invited along. And gradually, what began as adult familiarity becomes a childhood inner circle.
Meanwhile, other children can find themselves on the outside looking in. Or with a fence in between.
I’m not suggesting that every missed invitation is an act of exclusion, or that parents should be expected to accommodate every playdate request. Families have busy schedules, different circumstances, and legitimate boundaries. Nor should children be forced into friendships that don’t come naturally.
But there’s a difference between allowing friendships to develop organically and quietly deciding which ones are worth nurturing.
When we repeatedly make those decisions based on our own relationships, we risk teaching our children that belonging is something inherited through social connections rather than built through mutual kindness and genuine affection.
And perhaps the most troubling part is that the children themselves may have had very little say in the matter.
What Kids Learn From Watching Us
Actions always speak louder than words. We can tell kids to “be kind” and “include everyone,” but when they see us or others subtly gatekeeping their friendships, they learn a different lesson: that inclusion is conditional. That it’s easier to stick with the group than to welcome someone new. That social comfort is more valuable than compassion. Or worse, to lose esteem for themselves.
But not all kids will develop an avoidant attachment style—many kids can also become resilient. Sometimes they fight for a friend in spite of us. Sometimes they sense that the barriers aren’t really about them, but about the adults pulling the strings. My hope—the thing that keeps me from losing heart—is that they won’t absorb these exclusionary patterns wholesale. That they’ll choose a different way when it’s their turn to parent.
The Unspoken Privilege of Parental Involvement
Perhaps part of why this got stuck in my craw is because it was around this age that I found navigating these dynamics myself became clear.
Growing up as the child of hardworking immigrants, I didn’t always have parents who could devote their limited time and energy to the social machinery surrounding childhood. They were often busy providing for our family, and would get home spent from the work day. My mom would work Saturday mornings, up until I was about 16 years old, and my dad missed quite a few school band concerts and sports team games of mine.
Meanwhile, other parents seemed to have the time, connections, or influence to become fixtures in their children’s school and social lives. They knew people, cultivated relationships, and helped open doors that weren’t necessarily available to everyone.
Sometimes, I felt that adults’ opinions of my parents—or even of me—could influence how I was treated. Looking back, I understand how much of what I experienced was very common and perhaps being an only child just made it take a little longer to piece together.
Jockeying for Friendship
I’m not a mental health professional who can discuss what social exclusion can do to a child, but I can tell you that how your child spends the hours between 3:30 and dinner make a difference. And as the mother of an only, I was intent on finding ways for her to spend them with friends or socializing. Getting that sense of belonging that took me a very long time to find.
But you know what? Even though I give her so much more time than my parents could afford to give me, she hasn’t been spared these things I went through. The only difference is that she has had so much more time and support from my husband and I than my parents could give me. Not insulation, but being like her guardian angels or coaches, helping her not lose self esteem and gain the elasticity to bounce back from relationship disappointment. And maybe a little bit of pattern recognition (not a bad call back to chess), or foresight, so she can navigate bullies, toxic parents, or manipulation.
Now, as a parent, I can’t help wondering how many children are navigating similar experiences. How many are quietly learning that their place in a social circle depends not only on who they are, but on how visible, connected, or socially accepted their parents happen to be?
And how many eventually stop trying—not because they no longer want to belong, but because trying has become too painful?
Breaking the Cycle
Breaking the cycle of exclusion I think starts with asking ourselves: Are we opening doors for our children—or quietly closing some of them?
Some parents need to unlearn some nervous habits with regard to losening their grip on their child(ren)’s social lives. Others need to learn to trust them to build friendships based on genuine connection, not parental orchestration. And then there are the parents who need to do some serious self-examination before they continue to inadvertently do damage.
Our relationships with other parents don’t have to define our child’s. We don’t have to be friends with every parent. Our children don’t have to be friends with every child. And inclusion doesn’t mean an invitation to everything. It means asking whether we’re helping our child develop their own sense of belonging or simply handing down our social circles as though they were an inheritance.
Inclusion isn’t something we can preach into existence. It has to be modeled. It has to be lived. And it starts with taking responsibility for the ways we’ve fallen short or contributed to someone’s child’s hurt.
Our kids deserve better than being pawns in an adult game of friendship jockeying. They deserve the chance to write their own social stories, discover unexpected friendships, and find belonging on their own terms.
Every child deserves a chance at friendship—to deny a child friendship for selfish, vain, or poor reasons is one of the cruelest things. And that’s all I have to say about that. 🙂
Leave a Reply